I read the article but I did not find it clear at all. They quote the court’s reasoning but what is the implication of it? Or is it just an opinion without any consequences?
That’s not really clear in actuality. Different people have different opinions on what might be the results, and a few of them are quoted in the article stating their takes on it. The fact that the reality isn’t clear yet isn’t exactly the article’s fault.
I believe the only relevant quote was from the defense lawyer, and he’s not exactly an uninvolved expert. I was hoping for more analysis or context on the German legal system and how this could play out. But they didn’t include any such information.
Hm… yeah, maybe so. They linked to taz, they quoted a random member of Masch, and they cited some other cases, but yeah maybe it would have been good to have an actual legal expert weighing in on how realistic it is that this will mean anything significant.
I read the article but I did not find it clear at all. They quote the court’s reasoning but what is the implication of it? Or is it just an opinion without any consequences?
That’s not really clear in actuality. Different people have different opinions on what might be the results, and a few of them are quoted in the article stating their takes on it. The fact that the reality isn’t clear yet isn’t exactly the article’s fault.
I believe the only relevant quote was from the defense lawyer, and he’s not exactly an uninvolved expert. I was hoping for more analysis or context on the German legal system and how this could play out. But they didn’t include any such information.
Hm… yeah, maybe so. They linked to taz, they quoted a random member of Masch, and they cited some other cases, but yeah maybe it would have been good to have an actual legal expert weighing in on how realistic it is that this will mean anything significant.