Posted by one of my acquaintances that claims to be an ANCAP but also thinks Fucker Carlson has good ideas, and that trans people and poor people are ruining America. Also worships Elon. I hate these people.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have never come across a situation where the word “less” being used instead of “fewer” led to any kind of confusion. The “rule” is nonsense and doesn’t add to the language.

    I’m generally a fan of stricter guidelines to language to prevent it from losing meaning (e.g. if “literally” can mean “figuratively,” we no longer have a word for what “literally” is supposed to mean). But rules for the sake of rules (e.g. don’t end a sentence on a preposition) that don’t add anything to the language is ridiculous. The point of language is to convey information. If the rules do more to get in the way of that communication than help it (like “it’s actually fewer, not less” in the middle of a discussion), then those rules are bad and should be ignored.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, I’m sorry my scope for history included greater or less years than your preferred scope, I hope this doesn’t make you think fewer of my point.

      Next you’re going to tell me you don’t care about affect/effect, and the dreaded alot.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t have alot of issues with either, they don’t effect me either way (though affect and effect are two different words with distinct meaning, but I don’t think having them as distinct words is necessary. Plenty of words have noun and verb variations). The “effect as a verb” should really go away, though. It only breeds confusion.