ylai@lemmy.ml to Python@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agoPEP 744 – JIT Compilationpeps.python.orgexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down10cross-posted to: python@lemmy.ml
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkPEP 744 – JIT Compilationpeps.python.orgylai@lemmy.ml to Python@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: python@lemmy.ml
minus-squarefruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoHow does it compare to the work the pypy project has been with JIT?
minus-squareSolemarc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoIn the article it’s said that the JiT has similar performance to the latest stable interpreter but that it’s also very unoptimised. So I would assume it’s inferior to the pypy implementation right now.
How does it compare to the work the pypy project has been with JIT?
In the article it’s said that the JiT has similar performance to the latest stable interpreter but that it’s also very unoptimised. So I would assume it’s inferior to the pypy implementation right now.