• HumbleFlamingo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    and that is demonstrably false or they wouldn’t have let Portal Revolution release. if they were going to be litigious about the Portal IP, why would they DMCA Portal64 but not Revolution?

    Revolution is a mod for Portal 2 and requires the purchase of Portal 2 to play. Anyone who wants to play it has already given money to valve, or needs to. Revolution Is great for Valve, they do basically nothing and get they more sales of Portal 2. Portal64 does nothing for Valve.

    There is a very clear incentive for Valve to not only allow but boost Revolution.

    While Valve permits Revolution, a game that benefits the company, it does not imply they would also permit Portal64, a game that lacks benefits for Valve.

    • Luvon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I read of the portal64 project it did require owning the original (or having a copy of it) because it patches the assets from the base game.

      • HumbleFlamingo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Portal64 required you to have access to one file from portal 1, portal_pak_000.vpk. It’s trivial to get that file. Either via google, or purchasing Portal, extracting the file, then getting a refund.

        Revolution requires a continuously working copy of Portal 2.

        It’s significantly easier for the general population to play Portal64 without giving money to Valve than Revolution.