• 1 Post
  • 68 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle





  • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldtoVideos@lemmy.worldGay Frogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    First off chemtrails are very much based on reality, it is called cloud seeding and was used during the Cold war to alter the weather of Vietnam an incredibly controversial event at the time, one might say a government coverup.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye

    Second, the Gay Bomb (The thing he was ranting about at the time)was an actual non-lethal measure they were working on and the only reason it doesn’t exist is because it is most likely impossible, he went off on a tangent about putting chemicals in the water that makes the Frogs gay and that is most likely incorrect simply because there is no reason and it would probably be noticed by now, but I wouldn’t put anything past the government, and just because this specific conspiracy theorie is most likely bunk doesn’t mean they like, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr, that is all but proved to be a CIA opp.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb


  • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldtoVideos@lemmy.worldGay Frogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    This isn’t nearly as funny when you learn that we are infact putting medication in our water from unused medicine and industrial runoff that can alter the sex characteristics of amphibians including Frogs

    Or if you want a catchy technically inaccurate but conveys the same message catch phrase:

    We’re putting chemicals in the water that makes the frogs gay.



  • EDIT: Fixed grammar with AI.

    The word deviant doesn’t have a concrete meaning in scientific terms.

    So, no—objectively speaking, gay people are not “deviant,” since morality is a human construct. (And even if it weren’t, that would be a philosophical question.)

    The best way I could reframe this question is:

    A. Are we evolutionarily predisposed to find people with alternative* sexual preferences distasteful or unpleasant?

    B. Are alternative* sexual preferences evolutionarily harmful to society?

    C. Are alternative* sexual preferences harmful to an individual’s own evolutionary success?

    D. If any of the above are true, is the psychological or societal damage so detrimental—either to the individual or to society—that it would still be preferable to engage in alternative* sexual desires?

    In this context, “alternative” refers to anything outside of a heterosexual relationship. However, these questions can be narrowed down to whatever specific sexual preferences you are inquiring about.


    I won’t offer my own opinion on this, nor will I present any scientific evidence. But I will say this: I don’t think the issue is as black and white as some might assume.


  • You should always Question everything, If someone tells you not to question it, question it Harder.

    If it is the Truth then it doesn’t matter if you Question it or not, and nobody should care if you question it

    If it’s a Lie, then You need to know why you’re being lied to, you need to know who benefits from it, you need to know if the Lie was worth suppression of the Truth.

    If your life is truly better with the Lie it is always better to know and make that decision for yourself, never let others dictate what you believe because it is better for them, If you are going to follow a Lie make sure it is in your best interest. Because anyone will tell you a lie to help themselves but no one will willingly work against their own self interest.








  • Exactly l, you can monitor all the digital goods you want but the people who want privacy can always fall back to cash (technically they can track serial numbers but it’s nowhere near as invasive and can only be counted when it is spent with an untrusted source) they can turn off your banking account but they can’t turn off the cash you have buried in the back yard.


  • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldtoVideos@lemmy.worldDeath to Nickels
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Getting rid of paper money sounds good on paper😏, but it’s genuinely a terrible Idea, It allows the government to track every single dollar you spend, right down to your totally legal weed your definitely smoking in Colorado. It would give the US government the surveillance capabilities of visa, Google and Facebook combined. Which is why I’m surprised it hasn’t happened yet, the only thing I can think of is it would weaken the dollar to other countries, the US could just turn off an entire country organization or individual’s entire economy, China and any country remotely hostile would immediately dump the dollar.