As a leftist you should understand that it’s insincere to compare implementations of communism to the core inextricable functions of capitalism. Bad implementations of communism have wealth disparity, all implementations of capitalism have wealth disparity.
deleted by creator
We could oblige and give them an end and the nothing that would finally satisfy them :)
Legal disclaimer: I mean butts
They still have people that can say no to them, their workers can quit, they need to deal with consumers boycotting their products.
Globally, China is rapidly catching up to and surpassing Americans in more and more industries, and they need to protect their status.
Nothing is enough for them.
but surely we have to go back to the Sassanids to find an analogue for current events
there is in Canada
That’s a fair point, improving the subscription feed would be in their best interest for the people who use it, even if that number is low.
The problems with that feed which he touched on in the video are pretty significant. If you subscribe to channels that put out lots of content and ones that rarely do, it becomes much harder to use.
One thing he didn’t mention is also that it’s not conducive to discovering and gradually catching up on the back catalogue of a new channel, which is something the home feed excels at.
I’m sure YouTube prefers you use the home feed and has no plans to improve subscriptions, and there are real issues with it, so it’ll probably continue to decline.
I’m sorry I’ve been dragging them into the theater and making them play games they don’t want to play, it’s my fault
I dunno! I’ve been avoiding it in my feed for the most part.
I’m very far from conservative, but I’m rooting for you all to hold the line as the Reddit ones continue to arrive
Not like minded… I’m not opposed to the principles you lay out in your abstract but the monarchy power structure isn’t what I’m interested in.
Socialism, communism, and ultimately anarchism are the way forward in my opinion.
Imagine forcing this into conversation to cry about this so many years later.
Code is a language that can describe all sorts of systems, some of those systems have rigid hierarchies and some of those systems are distributed.
Software development teams also tend to work in collaborative ways, as much as Agile and Scrum development practices are bastardized in many large companies the core philosophies are very worker-empowering.
In the cases where companies use “waterfall” or misuse Agile the culprit seems to be managerial interference or very rigid and important requirements (e.g. a plane software system that must not fail)
I see your point, but per the above I would say it’s not universal and I would also counter that software architects have very open-ended solutions to choose from and are used to thinking about a system as a whole, which in my case at least leads me to questioning how our political and social systems can change for the better.
Fair take, and applies in every industry. Basically what I’m trying to say is it’s all about capitalism baby. The shit floats
I think you’re overlooking all of the free and open source software and people like me who work in the industry and are radical leftists.
The more likely connection here is that these are all rich CEOs…
Yes that’s another really good point. Any sort of foreign support from Russia or China or Europe that brings weapons in would mean a permanent thorn in their side, Canada wouldn’t see peace for decades, if at all. Similar to the quagmire in Afghanistan and Iraq.
That’s in addition to how easily we could strike at their home territory in cross border raids, which will be even more unacceptable domestically.
It’s the world’s longest border, a military defeat is certain but hundreds or thousands of Canadian partisans will easily get through to commit acts of terrorism and sabotage.
THE DEMOCRATS, THEY WERE UPVOTING
People forget that crashes are a debugging tool indicating an error. Silent errors can be much more dangerous. C and C++ in particular need to be careful not to overwrite random memory for example.
Yes the consequences for JS failures are less severe and so JS can get away with it, but a crash is a way to know your program isn’t doing what you thought it was, properly.
It just so happens that JS is used in contexts where nobody really cares, and errors aren’t a big deal, cheap and fast wins.