whew, thank you for bringing up elon musk.

I was worried I would see a thread without his name in it.

great idea, go overboard and make him furious, surely this won’t have any bad ramifications for her.

it’s a pretty simple app, what are you having issues with?

you can get an Ender 3 on sale for $100.

probably cheaper to invest in one rather than continuously pay for a service to print them off.

some libraries will 3D print stuff for very cheap though.

that doesn’t take into account how commonly it’s used though.

far far more people drink alcohol.

we have no idea what you are talking about

opioids kill 70k people per year in the US alone.

“conspiracy theory”

my brother, it is simple pattern recognition.

So how would a couple more limitations completely remove the right to own arms?

it is an obvious slippery slope.

there will never be a time in which people who seek to restrict the 2A will go:

“ah, yes, this is enough limitations, we are done”

that’s why it’s important to put your foot down and stop it in its tracks.

No, it is not.

I’m just talking about on the website, should have clarified.

not if you have anything to say about it

The, ah, armorer he hired, knowing he was a total fuck up?

is there any proof of this?

this is the correct take. there should be no expectation of actors to be responsible for their own safety around guns on set. That is literally the job of the armorer (who should be responsible), and depending on how negligent Baldwin was as the director for hiring her, Baldwin could also hold responsibility.

Imagine if an actor was performing a stunt and the rope snapped and they died.

Would people be talking about how he didn’t practice correct rope safety?

how many times do you think about trump everyday?

stupid comment:

• people who have different opinions that you are not “trolls” they just disagree with you
• do you think pro 2A folks think that people that commit gun crimes shouldn’t be punished?

One thing they rightfully always bring up is that in many of these shootings, the existing laws weren’t even being followed, yet they always spur cries for new laws that would only hurt law abiding citizens.

I am going to ask you to actually consider the following situation. Let’s say in the future hate speech is criminalized. If someone goes and says something very evil, would you support removing the first amendment rights of all citizens based on their actions?

https://annas-archive.org/search

oh sorry, that was a different fake story.

https://news.yahoo.com/idf-says-wont-back-claim-150213726.html

hmmmmmm

and you sound like a TV race American that can be manipulated by the slightest bit of propaganda into supporting anything

where is the proof?