Possibly the only proper answer if we put a minimum on the number of films required to be considered.

deleted by creator

Technically yes. They are basically constitutional fundamentalists and have decided giving money to a political cause counts as free speech and are against any limitation of free speech.

Pole vault dick and break dancer are videos, not still images. Maybe that will be a different category

That last part is the biggest annoyance for me. Gives me false hope a conversation has started

If you were around during the early 90s on Usenet you would see a lot of people talking about how Simpsons peaked in season 1. More grounded. More focused on struggling family.

The ABC article felt like satire in how much it avoided context or referencing what was said in the video

Thanks. That was my guess but I wasn’t sure if there was more to it. Like they had to start connected or something

Can someone explain why it’s two vs one?

As long as they don’t go anywhere in the Indian Ocean.

Speed Racer is a wonderful film fully embracing the formalism side of film making. My favorite film by them.

dril’s absurdism will be studied and praised