The content about the reasons for different smiles is cool. And the highlighting of the training data influencing things is also good stuff.
But as far as realistic image generation based on culturally relatable smiling sounds like a skill issue. You can’t just generate images about specific times or settings or people with “defaults”. You have to specify your prompt.
Lol also the importing of lpad and iseven
Agree. Teenagers or the otherwise immature wish for this because it feels like some sort of vengeance or something. An exertion of will…
But the real deal is not wanting political violence at all.
When I say “those people” I mean people who don’t pick up their dogshit or don’t put their cart away and are fully capable lol
Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the license plate said PRIVATE
Please give this another read over
Next plan: robot legs
Finances b crazy
Bro you’re on Lemmy lol
That’s a problem though, you can’t dictate where people live, within the country. Even if you tried, assigning them to a very expensive town, perhaps where no one knows them or speaks their language just puts them dead in the water.
Also, the US has a primary language, not a federally official language. The same issues of disadvantage occur if you can’t speak English.
Ok well that suggestion is silly, there’s zero chance of it happening in November.
Are you suggesting a third party will get anywhere near the votes than either trump or Harris?
They are children, or act like them.
Jumping to absolutes is generally the wrong move.
Observing criminals in action is not vigilantism. Discussing how that could be construed as illegal behavior is shady.
Nothing on lemmy is legal advice lmao.
Further, they opened 2 way remote desktop connectivity. That is a literal invitation
Edit now that that is covered, and completely distinct from all previous points and lines of discussion, it’s pretty shady to be looking for legal safe harbor for scammers who rob people all over the world every day.
They are opening persistent 2 way connections to people’s machines with the clear goal of destroying them. There is little argument to suggest it is inappropriate to observe them while they do it.
When someone opens a connection on your network you are not obligated to avoid utility of those connected systems. It is not a crime to connect to things which have willfully joined your network.
If someone puts a camera on your network, you can view it. Authorization is moot when it’s in your house.
Edit I agree if you seek out someone else’s network and connect to and operate devices there.
Edit edit put simply they forfeit any expectations of privacy when they open a connection to his network
What crime? He’s accessing resources they connected to his network
It’s not a legal proceeding, he’s the (very capable) victim of a crime at that moment. It’s his experience as an individual, not an authority.
It’s like if he had a security camera on his front porch and filmed porch pirates stealing his deliveries, then turned his sprinkler on
Are you couch fucker weird?
That would be a rare, shiny PEM