Network Chuck

God, thanks for the IT class PTSD flashback. Idk why but Network Chuck is so annoying for me. The way he just shills his coffee. Sorry Chuck

Alienphobe, go back to truth social

Makes sense. I think if there are no cars behind you, stopping and letting the saucer land is the best way to go

UFO’s are allowed to use roads in non-emergency situations as well. They land on low traffic roads and then quickly exit off the side of the road. Something about the way ufo’s are built, its actually safer for them to land on hard pavement and then transfer to grass then it is for them to land on grass directly.

I think the reason the UFO road sharing laws are so unclear is because they are so new and already changing a lot. For example, some cities have banned UFO road landings and some states have built helipads specifically for UFOs, eliminating the need for road landing. However, I have seen one ufo trying to make a road landing while I was driving before. I just kind’ve pulled to the shoulder and waited as I wasn’t sure what the rules were.

Depends on if they’re signalling to land or not.

For a flying saucer, if they have the ground-facing spotlight on they are preparing to land. They don’t keep the spotlight on if they don’t need visibility of the ground. In fact, that would be reckless as the spotlight might blind (not literally, but just light glare) people on the ground.

The UFO is in the air in this case, preparing to make a vertical landing on the roadway

The UFO could be issued a citation for taking an unauthorized vehicle on a public roadway

It’s not that simple though. UFO’s are allowed to land on public roadways if they do so safely (on a low traffic road, not blocking multiple lanes, exits the roadway quickly after landing).

It’s all a balance. I don’t want to punch in my PIN in front of everyone either.

Constantly attacks marginalized groups.

That’s a feature, not a bug

Cucumb her? I hardly know her!

Why 21 and not 18 though?

Yeah I don’t think that’s the plan for most people. Some people just don’t want to take on the resposibility of kids and tubal litigation and vasectomies are good ways to prevent kids.

Yeah I don’t think there it some capitalist conspiracy trying to stop people from masturbating. Kellogg is long dead

it even helpfully dispenses some lube if you REALLY get into it!

Yeah, not for everyone.

Couple this with how incredibly unhealthy the social relationships portrayed in most pornography are, and you’re gearing up for a lot of young men addicted to wanking and having unrealistic expectations of sex.

I don’t really get this honestly. When people watch The Flash, they know that it’s unrealistic for someone to move at that speed. When people read sci-fi, they know it’s unrealistic to expect every problem to be solved by science in their lifetime. When people watch the show Superstore, they don’t expect it to actually be a realistic representation on how a big box store runs. So I don’t see why porn would be any different. They’re all acting.

Defeat the ruling class… jerk off

What about this video?

I’m sure some digital piracy involves stealing. Someone has to have taken some floppy disk software from a store and walked out without paying for it, then made pirated copies of that disk

Digital Restrictions Management

Yep. Welcome to America, where all bald eagles live free.