He has no abdominal control so raising his arms unbalanced him.

This is very simple, he is disabled and the cop who arrested him is extremely stupid.

This is probably one of those stories where you go in knowing how it ends but you still hope for a different outcome

Seems like he got a reality check right as he was starting to get into the sov cit nonsense.

The wife is probably in too far at this point and seems like she’s not firing on all cylinders.

Some of the commentary was a bit harsh, as it’s clear the man has been misled, and unfortunately even some clever people fall into these traps when they’re desperate.

Really though if the vehicle was registered and she had a valid licence… why the fuck wasn’t she driving?

It’s not like China allows Facebook, so really it’s just a very delayed tit for tat response.

Carbon still fits into the laws of physics you nonce.

I used one word in error.

Wrong as I have already clearly stated.

Carbon… which doesn’t fit nicely into the known laws of physics

This is complete and utter bullshit and the fact you don’t understand this is really damning.

Remember the actual question?

What’s a carbon dust shell and why’s that cool?

Carbon is well understood and behaves as expected. Science can and has explained why those carbon dust shells are present in the JWST image.

So you didn’t address the question, you were wrong, and you’ve continued arguing about it because that’s what morons spreading misinformation do.

You could have just said you don’t know why those carbon rings are there or even (the horror) kept quiet.

Instead you posted bullshit and got called out.

I don’t care beyond telling you that you are full of shit and should know when to shut up.

The problems are your hurt fee fees and they’re more important than the facts are they?

So you went from ‘mr STEM’ to ‘shitposting in public is my right’.

Well I agree, it’s a public forum, being called out on your bullshit is part of the fun.

Get over yourself.

Your incorrect non-answer to the question helps no one.

Your shitposting is the issue here.

Get educated.

It’s not one word it is the entire thrust of this claim

doesn’t fit nicely into the known laws of physics

Carbon and H2O have been studied extensively, they are well understood and your claim is counter to that.

If you had issues understanding it or believe it isn’t intuitive then that’s fine but a blanket statement that physics models are ‘broken’ when it comes to water is ridiculous.

Good, that was always an option.

And you’re responding like a moron. You have failed to engage at all on the topic of misinformation and instead choose to defend spreading brain rot.

Please be my guest and spend your life correcting misinformation spouting morons on the internet instead.

The morons don’t listen or learn and only pollute online spaces.

So no a simple correction would not suffice and you would know that if you were paying attention.

element which doesn’t fit nicely into the known laws of physics

You might be offended but you really do need this; you’re an uneducated idiot spouting nonsense and you should stop.

Feels like they were going for more pokemon on screen rather than high framerates to me, but the days of hyper optimisation like we saw on the PS2/PS3 are gone for most companies.

Seems they learnt a fair bit by the time they did Scarlet/Violet or were there problems with those as well?

What are you talking about?

It is known as a fact that asexual reproduction does occur and does not involve the merging of two zygotes.

Everything else you have spouted is purely irrelevant and is deflection.

It is clear you have too much ego to properly participate in science.

I was reading the book description and thinking this sounds like an entirely reasonable basis for an analysis. I didn’t see the comment until I read yours.

Where’s a useless red circle when you need one?

Asexual reproduction has been observed, measured, studied and is fairly well understood.

The specific claim that all multicellular life starts with two zygotes merging is incorrect. While not the main thrust of the article it is wrong.

Your additional claims are simply absurd and you could spend some minimal effort to understand asexual reproduction before making ignorant claims.

Here I will give you a place to start: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=asexual+reproduction+in+animals