As an Australian, no we didn’t. We just had it put in context. Jews around the world are great people, the Israeli government and the hardline supporters are absolute monsters. I hope the Australian government tells them as much. Israel deserves no support and everything that may happen when it’s withdrawn.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Reminder that defunding UNRAW is an attempt to make people forget about ICJ ruling.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The ruling that said nothing more than to ask Israel to behave? Why would a distraction from this even be necessary?

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        The preliminary ruling that found the claims of genocide plausible and will continue to convene on the issue further?

        • DdCno1@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They established that South Africa has a case, that the case falls under the jurisdiction of the court and that “at least some of the acts and omissions alleged by South Africa to have been committed by Israel in Gaza appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the Convention”. Notice how careful the wording is: “At least some”, “alleged”, “appear to be capable of falling within” - this kind of wording is being used to express a great deal of uncertainty. Legal language like this is incredibly precise and it demands to be read with the same amount of precision.