• twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    The choice is “help people from systematically disadvantaged groups” or “don’t.” I’d argue that the “don’t” would be the easier choice.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, that’s a false dichotomy, there are other choices. Such as “help disadvantaged people regardless of their genetics.” I reject the “but it’s too hard” argument. If racial discrimination or gender discrimination or discrimination based on orientation is wrong, then it’s wrong. Don’t put an asterisk on it with a list of types that it’s okay for.

      • steventrouble@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ok then, how about instead of complaining about the best solution we’ve thought of so far, you tell us what your brilliant solution to racism is? I’ll wait.