• Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed.

    And I feel like the biggest thing the people are seeing at this point is how different each states voting practices are.

    I remember getting perplexed by the concept of a caucus when my state just had 2 parallel primary elections.

    Maine has a dude who can just decide that?

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re the secretary of state. Every state has one. Their primary job is administering elections in the state. This includes applying rules for eligibility of candidates. For instance if you were 30 and applied to be put on the ballet for president, it would be the secretary of state who says no, you must be at least 35, we’re not putting you on. Of course their decisions about various things can be challenged in court and often are.

      In the Colorado case the decision first came from a judge, because there the secretary of state declined to take him off the ballot. Colorado voters sued their secretary of state for neglect or breach of duty for allowing Trump on the ballot in violation of the fourteenth amendment.

      Here’s the ruling from that case where you can see it was technically the secretary of state for Colorado who was sued:

      https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Anderson-v-Griswold_Verified-Petition_2023.09.06_01.pdf

      In Maine no one had to sue the secretary of state first, the secretary of state just said straight up, hey trump you’re not eligible, 14th amendment applies, just like they would have if he didn’t meet other qualifications like being a natural born citizen or being at least the age of 35. Now likely Trump will sue the secretary of state in Maine to try and get the courts to put him back on. They also became involved in the litigation in Colorado after it started, since he had an interest in the case.