• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could call Hamas combat ineffective and declare truece.

    Wiping out Hamas is the current stated goal, not rendering them ineffective. You don’t set a condition you can’t meet if your intention is to stop at some point.

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It all depends on your definition of wiping out. I’m sure your not going to get every single one. BTW, Saudi, Jordan and Egypt really want them to wipe them all out. They consider Hamas another Muslim Brotherhood, and don’t give a shit about the Gazians.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It all depends on your definition of wiping out.

        Do you suppose Netanyahu will be content with leaving Hamas’ leadership intact?

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think Netanyahu will be content to stay out of jail. He might not get to make that call.

          Israel has got, between regular and reserve, about half million troops in the field. It’s GDP isn’t good enough to carry the cost for that for too long. It may be less of a decision than you might think.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It would be, but that will never happen

                You sure? Let’s examine domestic politics regarding the war:

                Republicans are in favor of the “plain of uninhabited slag” outcome for its own sake.

                Progressives want the war to end, preferably quickly.

                And centrist Democrats have a few reasons to side with Republicans on this: It doesn’t involve altering the status quo. They get to be seen as bipartisan by doing something Republicans want. And they have a GWB-style “terrorist sympathizer” cudgel to deploy against progressives.

                Way I see it, Netanyahu will have us doing whatever he wants until the cudgel stops working at the earliest, since he can count on having both Republicans and centrist Dems in his corner.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I was wondering when you’d start with the condescending dismissals.

                    Turns out, all I had to do was describe your behavior. Congratulations on your acquisition of a cudgel.